Chandler, Ariz. – There were dozens of statements submitted to the Court by family and friends of Christopher Pelkey when it was time to sentence the man condemned for firing him fatally during an anger incident on the road. They provided glimpse of Pelkey humor, his character and his military service.
But there was nothing like listening to the victim itself, even if it was a version generated by artificial intelligence.
In what is believed to be the first in the courts of the United States, Pelkey’s family used AI to create a video using its similarity to give it a voice. The representation of AI of Pelkey told the shooter during the sentence hearing last week in Phoenix that it was a shame that they had to meet that day in 2021 in those circumstances, and that in another life, the two could probably have been friends.
“I believe in forgiveness and in God that I forgive. I have always done it and I still do,” said Pelkey Avatar to Gabriel Paul Horcasitas.
The version of Pelkey encouraged people to make the most of every day and love, without knowing how long it could have remained.
While the use of AI within the judicial system is being expanded, it has generally been reserved for administrative tasks, legal investigation and cases preparation. In Arizona, he has helped Inform the public of decisions in significant cases.
But the use of AI to generate impact statements of victims marks a new and legal tool, at least in Arizona, to share information with the court outside the probative phases.
The judge of the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Todd Lang, who presided over the case, said after watching the video he imagined to Pelkey, who was 37 years old at the time of his murder, he would have felt like this after hearing him. Lang also pointed out that the video said something about Pelkey’s family, who had expressed his anger for his death and asked Horcasitas to receive the maximum sentence.
“Although that is what you wanted, you allowed Chris to speak from his heart as you saw,” Lang said.
Horcasitas, 54, was convicted of involuntary homicide and sentenced to 10.5 years in prison.
Horcasitas lawyer, Jason Lamm, told Associated Press that they filed a notice to appeal their sentence within a few hours of the hearing. Lamm said that the Court of Appeals Sopese is likely if the judge incorrectly depended on the video of AI when delivering the sentence.
The shooting occurred on November 13, 2021, since both drivers were arrested in a red light. According to the records, Pelkey was shot after leaving his truck and walking towards the car of Horcasitas.
Pelkey’s sister, Stacey Wales, raised the idea that her brother spoke for himself after fighting to discover what she would say. She wrote a script for the video generated by AI, reflecting that he was an indulgent person.
In Arizona, the victims can give their impact statements in any digital format, said victims’ rights lawyer Jessica Gattuso, who represented the family.
Wales, a software product consultant, took the idea of AI to her husband, Tim. He and his friend, who have work experience creating avatars of AI as humans. Using a video clip of Pelkey, they intended to replicate their voice and speech patterns. They generated the similarity of Pelkey through a single image of it, manipulating it digitally to remove glasses and a hat logo, edit their attire and cut their beard.
The president of the Supreme Court of Arizona, Ann Timmer, did not address the case of anger specifically in an interview on Wednesday. But he said that the increase in popularity and accessibility to AI in recent years led to the creation of a committee to investigate best practices in court.
Gary Marchant, a member of the Committee and Law professor at Arizona State University, said he understands why Pelkey’s family did it. But he warned that the use of this technology could open the door to more people trying to introduce evidence generated by the courts.
“There is a real concern between the Judiciary and among lawyers that Deepfake’s evidence will be used more and more,” he said. “It is easy to create it and anyone can do it on a phone, and it could be incredibly influential because judges and jurors, like all of us, are accustomed to believing what you see.”
Marchant pointed out a recent case in New York, where a man without a lawyer used an Avatar generated by AI to discuss his case in a video demand. The judges took only seconds to realize that the man who headed to them from the video screen did not exist at all.
In the case of Arizona, Wales said that the video generated by AI worked because the judge had almost 50 letters of family and friends who echoed the video of the video.
“Everyone knew that Chris would forgive this person,” Wales said.
___
Yamat reported Las Vegas. Associated Press reporter Susan Montoya Bryan in Albuquerque, New Mexico, contributed to this report.
