Washington – He Supreme Court Monday rejected an appeal from Minnesota asking to relive the state of the state Prohibit weapons transport permits for young adults.
The judges also left a Prohibit weapons At the University of Michigan, declining to hear an appeal of a man who argued that he has the right to be armed on the campus. No justice noticed a dissent in any of the cases.
Together, the actions reflect the apparent lack of appetite of the Superior Court for the cases that explore the constitutional right to “maintain and carry weapons.”
The Court has repeatedly rejected weapons cases since its 2022 ruling that Expanded weapons rights and a 2024 explanatory decision that confirmed a federal arms control law That is intended to protect victims from domestic violence.
The decision not to listen to the case of Minnesota was surprising because both parties sought the review of the Supreme Court and the courts throughout the country have reached different conclusions on whether states can limit weapons rights of 18 to 20 years without violating the Constitution.
The Federal Court of Appeals of St. Louis ruled that the prohibition of Minnesota in conflict with the second amendment, which the Court indicated does not establish an age limit and generally protects young adults who respect the law.
In January, the Federal Court of Appeals in New Orleans annulled a federal law that demanded that young adults be 21 years old to buy guns.
In February, a federal judge refused to block Hawaii’s prohibition of possession of weapons for people under 21 years.
